What is the difference between interviewing and interrogation?

The distinction between interviewing and interrogation lies primarily in the context and approach used during each process. Interviewing is characterized as a non-accusatory technique aimed at gathering information from individuals who may possess relevant knowledge, such as witnesses or victims. This method relies on open-ended questions to elicit responses without placing pressure on the interviewee, fostering a more comfortable environment where information can be freely shared.

On the other hand, interrogation is a more formal and accusatory approach typically directed at suspects. In this scenario, the intent is to extract a confession or to gather incriminating evidence. Interrogation often involves direct questioning that may include leading questions, tactics to establish rapport, or psychological pressure, all intended to elicit a specific admission or acknowledgment of wrongdoing.

Recognizing these differences is crucial for law enforcement as it ensures that procedures are conducted in accordance with legal standards and ethical considerations, impacting the admissibility of information gathered during these processes in legal proceedings.